Aracelli Del Carmen Barron-Macia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

985 F.2d 571 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Aracelli Del Carmen BARRON-MACIA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE Respondent. No. 90-70506. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 13, 1993. Decided Feb. 1, 1993. Before ALDISERT, * GOODWIN and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Aracelli del Carmen Barron-Macia ("Barron-Macia") appeals from an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") dismissing her appeal of the denial of her application for asylum by the Immigration Judge ("IJ"). We affirm the denial. 3 Barron-Macia contends that the BIA abused its discretion because (1) she had established a well-founded fear of persecution, and (2) the BIA failed to weigh the equities in favor of her application. 4 Barron-Macia claimed that her description of conditions in El Salvador established her well-founded fear of persecution if she were deported, and that the BIA abused its discretion in…