Alfred Banks v. Jim Ryan, Dave Uhlmeyer Hughes-Calihan Corp. Schall, Boudreau and Gore Inc.

985 F.2d 571 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alfred BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim RYAN, Dave Uhlmeyer; Hughes-Calihan Corp.; Schall, Boudreau and Gore Inc.; Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55881. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 27, 1993. * Decided Feb. 1, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alfred Banks appeals pro se the district court's orders dismissing several defendants from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit and the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the remaining defendants in claims for (1) conspiracy to deprive him of his civil rights under section 1983, (2) RICO conspiracy, and (3) intentional infliction of emotional distress. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 1 I. BACKGROUND 3 Banks filed claims for conspiracy to deprive him of his civil rights under section 1983, RICO conspiracy, and intentional infliction of…