R.M. Christiansen v. George H. Bush James A. Baker, Iii, Secretary of State

985 F.2d 571 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. R.M. CHRISTIANSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George H. BUSH; James A. Baker, III, Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35345. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 27, 1993. * Decided Feb. 5, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 R.M. Christiansen appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his action seeking (1) a declaration that the United States' and Soviet Union's agreement of June 1, 1990, clarifying the maritime boundaries in the North Pacific Ocean, is void because it transfers sovereignty over United States property in violation of article IV, section 3, clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, and (2) an injunction precluding Senate ratification of the agreement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm in part and dismiss in part. 3 * Summary Judgment 4 We…