Mario Jose Gomez-Mendieta v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

985 F.2d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mario Jose GOMEZ-MENDIETA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70214. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. * Decided Feb. 8, 1993. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; No. Amz-iof-zkc. I.N.S. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Before BEEZER, BRUNETTI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Petitioner Mario Jose Gomez-Mendieta seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") dismissal of his applications for a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("Act"), 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c), and for asylum and withholding of deportation pursuant to sections 208(a) and 243(h) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a) and 1253(h). We reverse and remand. 3 * Petitioner first claims that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his § 212(c) waiver…