Felix Pedro Flores-Molina v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

985 F.2d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Felix Pedro FLORES-MOLINA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 90-70532. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 13, 1993. * Decided Feb. 8, 1993. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; No. Apl-rvg-xpt. I.N.S. PETITION GRANTED. Before ALDISERT, ** GOODWIN and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 In Castillo-Villagra v. INS, 972 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir.1992), a Nicaraguan national and her two daughters appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals an adverse decision of an immigration judge who had denied the aliens' request for asylum or withholding of deportation. The aliens contended that they would be persecuted because of their stated anti-Sandinista sentiments were they to return to their homeland. In denying their appeal, the Board took administrative notice "that the Sandinista Party no longer governs…