Hamilton Taft & Co., In re

985 F.2d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re HAMILTON TAFT & COMPANY, a California Corporation, Debtor, HAMILTON TAFT & COMPANY, a California Corporation, Debtor-Appellant, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS; Stanford University; Stanford University Hospital; Frederick S. Wyle, Trustee for Hamilton Trust & Company, Creditors-Appellees. No. 92-15689. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 5, 1992. * Decided Jan. 25, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; D.C. No. CV-91-03518-JPV, B.C. No. 91-3-1077-LK, John P. Vukasin, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before TANG, PREGERSON and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Involuntary Chapter 11 Debtor-Appellant Hamilton Taft & Company (Hamilton) appeals from the district court's order dismissing its appeals of four separate bankruptcy court orders. Hamilton appealed from an order authorizing appointment of a…