Hayes v. Binion

Good Law
985 F.2d 572·1993 WL 29216·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8554
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 199391-15747California629 words

Opinion

Opinion

985 F.2d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Janice M. HAYES, individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benny BINION, aka Lester Ben Binion, aka L.B. Binion; United States of America, substituted by order of this United States District Court for defendants Nicholas Brady, Fred Goldberg, Jr., Lawrence Gibbs, Jesse Cota, Robert Withers, Bert Purdy, Harold Green, Paul E. Voelker, Unknown Agents or Employees of the United States, Internal Revenue Service, Richard Jones and Thomas Coleman, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15747. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. * Decided Feb. 9, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, No. CV-89-00848-PMP; Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. D.Nev. APPEAL DISMISSED. Before ALARCON, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Janice M. Hayes appeals two orders filed by the district court. The first order listed in Hayes's Notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.