C. Patrick Dugan Gertrude Dugan v. County of Santa Cruz

985 F.2d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. C. Patrick DUGAN; Gertrude Dugan, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al., Defendants-Appellees No. 90-16577. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 12, 1993. Decided Feb. 8, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CV-90-20155-SW, Spencer M. Williams, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before ALDISERT, * GOODWIN and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This appeal from a dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, of certain counts in a complaint and from adverse summary judgment as to all remaining counts require us to decide if appellants, C. Patrick Dugan and Gertrude Dugan, his wife, appearing pro se, were denied federal constitutional rights in their efforts to obtain a variance of a county zoning ordinance in order to remodel their residence by adding a second and…