Darwin Hamilton and Mary Hamilton v. United States

985 F.2d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darwin HAMILTON and Mary Hamilton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-36022. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 2, 1993. * Decided Feb. 9, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court District of Montana, No. CV-91-12-CCL; Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding. D.Mont. AFFIRMED. Before TANG, KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80 , Appellants Darwin and Mary Hamilton ("Hamiltons") brought suit against the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation ("FSLIC"), the Federal Home Loan Bank Board ("FHLBB"), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") ("Government"). 1 The Hamiltons allege that they were induced to enter into mortgage agreements through fraudulent misrepresentations made by the Government. The Hamiltons…