Dudley v. Government Employees Ins. Co.

985 F.2d 572 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stephen C. DUDLEY; Mary L. Pecha; Daniel Klisch; James Kelly; Jill Paasch; Gary T. Gerber, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY; Criterion Insurance Company; Criterion Casualty Company; Geico Corporation, Geico Indemnity Company, Donald Messmer, Eugene J. Meyung, DOES 1-50, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15717. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 11, 1992. Decided Jan. 26, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CV-90-01742-JPV John P. Vukasin, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Before CHAMBERS, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. * 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Six General Field Representatives (GFRs) employed by the Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgement in favor of GEICO on the GFRs' breach of contract claim. The…