Kenneth Lee Krause v. Harol L. Whitley

985 F.2d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth Lee KRAUSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harol L. WHITLEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16718. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 10, 1992. Decided Feb. 2, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; No. CV-N-87-527-ECR, Edward C. Reed, District Judge, Presiding. D.Nev. [APPEAL AFTER REMAND FROM 878 F.2d 386 .] AFFIRMED. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and SKOPIL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Kenneth L. Krause (Krause) appeals the district court's granting of defendants' motion for summary judgment in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. The essence of Krause's claim is that medical personnel at the Nevada State Prison (NSP) failed to diagnose or failed to refer him to a physician who could diagnose his brain aneurysm for approximately two-and-one-half years.…