Rodolfo Antonio Mairena-Arroliga Cristian Mairena-Cruz Jose Mairena-Cruz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
985 F.2d 573·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8342
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 3, 199391-70305California717 words

Opinion

Opinion

985 F.2d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rodolfo Antonio MAIRENA-ARROLIGA; Cristian Mairena-Cruz; Jose Mairena-Cruz, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70305. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 1, 1993. * Decided Feb. 3, 1993. Petition for Review of a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, INS. No. Ask-ynj-qtm. BIA REVERSED AND REMANDED. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and SNEED and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rodolfo Antonio Mairena-Arroliga and his two teen-aged sons, all natives and citizens of Nicaragua, petition this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of their appeal of the immigration judge's denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a) and 1253(h). 3 The BIA based its dismissal on its determination that there was "no basis to support the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.