Lyondell Petrochemical Co. Securities Litigation, In re

985 F.2d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY SECURITIES LITIGATION. Joseph H. LEVIT; Walter Bely; Elsie Bely; the Elsie Bely IRA; Lucy Feder; Rosalind Jacobson; Ronald Kassover; Hedy-Ann Kassover, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LYONDELL PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY; Bob G. Gower; Fred P. Rullo; Dan F. Smith; Robert E. Wycoff; Atlantic Richfield Co.; Camron Cooper; James S. Morrison; Robert M. Shea; Joseph A. Putz; William T. Butler; Dudley C. Mecum; Paul R. Staley; Goldman Sachs & Co.; Salomon Bros., Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55899. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 1992. Decided Jan. 29, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-90-0126-KN David V. Kenyon, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before POOLE, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiffs allege the Defendants violated…