Debora Hillding v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company, a Delaware Corporation

Good Law
985 F.2d 573·1993 WL 22375·61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 712·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8340
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 2, 199392-16250California1,430 words

Opinion

Opinion

985 F.2d 573 61 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 712 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Debora HILLDING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MCDONNELL DOUGLAS HELICOPTER COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16250. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 27, 1993. * Decided Feb. 2, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Debora Hillding appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company ("MDHC") in her employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. ("Title VII"). Hillding contends that the district court erred by finding that (1) she was not subjected to a hostile work environment based on her gender, and (2) she failed to establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment regarding her discharge. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.