Jose Prado-Perez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

985 F.2d 573 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose PRADO-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70520. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. * Decided Feb. 9, 1993. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, I & NS No. Awz-zyk-jdg. BIA AFFIRMED. Before FARRIS, POOLE and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 On July 31, 1984, Jose Prado-Perez, a citizen of Mexico, was issued an order to show cause why he should not be deported. His application for suspension of deportation, filed during the course of his deportation hearing was denied by the immigration judge, and Prado-Perez was determined to be deportable. He appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"), which affirmed the order of the immigration judge. He now appeals the BIA's order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Prado-Perez,…