Joan Sheehan v. United States

985 F.2d 574 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joan SHEEHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16479. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. * Decided Feb. 8, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CV-85-05952-CAL, Charles A. Legge, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before ALARCON, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Joan Sheehan, a federal employee, filed a complaint in the district court against the United States, under the Federal Tort Claims Act, for intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The district court dismissed this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm. 3 We have previously held that the comprehensive remedial scheme provided for federal employees in the Civil Service Reform Act deprives a federal court of subject matter jurisdiction to…