Suarez v. Hunter

985 F.2d 574 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Javier SUAREZ, Jose Garcia, Constantino Gamez, and Pedro Gamez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George HUNTER, Ruben Vela, Renee Battles, Anthony Cooley, Charles Hutchens, and Brad Simpson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35667. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 9, 1992. * Decided Jan. 29, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; No. CV-90-394-RE, James A. Redden, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before FARRIS, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiffs Javier Suarez, Jose Garcia, Constantino Gamez, and Pedro Gamez appeal the dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (3) claims against defendants, employees of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS"). After a bench trial, the district court dismissed plaintiffs' claims because plaintiffs failed both to establish the existence of a conspiracy, and to show…