Donnell J. Richards and Andree Richards v. John Jay Casey Holland-Livestock Ranch Casey Ranches and Numeroff-Holland Company

Good Law
985 F.2d 574·1993 WL 12500·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8441
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 199391-16255California913 words

Opinion

Opinion

985 F.2d 574 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8209 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donnell J. RICHARDS and Andree Richards, Plaintiffs-Appellant, v. John Jay CASEY; Holland-Livestock Ranch; Casey Ranches; and Numeroff-Holland Company, Defendants-Appellee. No. 91-16255. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and submitted Dec. 15, 1992. Decided Jan. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada No. CV-88-00340-HDM; Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding. D.Nev. AFFIRMED. Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Donnell and Andree Richards (Richards), Nevada cattle ranchers, brought a civil RICO action against John Casey (Casey), another cattle rancher. The district court entered summary judgment for Casey, stating that as a matter of law, Richards had not made out a case or controversy. We consider whether Richards has shown the requisite two or more racketeering violations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.