United States v. Eric Bobbitt, United States of America v. Michael Bobbitt

985 F.2d 574 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric BOBBITT, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael BOBBITT, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-50289, 91-50294. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 2, 1992. Decided Jan. 26, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-90-0582-RG-3, No. CR-90-0582-RG-2, Richard A. Gadbois, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before WALLACE, TROTT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eric and Michael Bobbitt appeal their convictions for distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We affirm. I. THE SUBSEQUENT DRUG DEAL 3 Both Eric and Michael argue that the court erred in admitting evidence of an attempted drug deal between the agent and Willie Bobbitt, the defendants' father. When Willie had trouble with his…