United States v. William Barkley, Kathleen White, and William C. White

Good Law
985 F.2d 574·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8443
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 21, 199392-10015California4,307 words

Opinion

Opinion

985 F.2d 574 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William BARKLEY, Kathleen White, and William C. White, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 91-10596, 91-10597 and 92-10015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 9, 1992. Decided Jan. 21, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CR-90-20048-WAI; William A. Ingram, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before TANG, PREGERSON and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 William White and William Barkley appeal from the judgment entered upon their convictions by a jury of four counts of tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 for taxable years 1983 through 1986, and one count of conspiracy to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 . Kathleen White appeals from the judgment entered upon her conviction of two counts of filing a false return in violation of 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.