United States v. Carlos Barron

985 F.2d 574 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos BARRON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50382. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 27, 1993 * Decided Feb. 2, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Carlos Barron appeals his conviction, following a guilty plea, for possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Barron contends that (1) the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized from his vehicle, and (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 1. Motion to Suppress 3 Barron claims that the district court erred by denying his suppression motion because the border patrol agents lacked reasonable suspicion for the stop. Alternatively, Barron contends that he did not voluntarily consent to…