Smith v. Hurd

985 F.2d 574 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Hugh V. SMITH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles H. HURD; C.F. Damon, Jr.; Charles W. Key; Vernon F.L. Char; Clinton K.L. Ching, R. Charles Bocken; Dennis C.H. Leong; Kenneth R. Kupchak; Steven H. Levinson; Diane D. Hastert; Ronald R. Sakamoto; Michael A. Yoshida; Dean E. Ochiai; David M.K. Lum; Denise C.H. Nip; John S. Rapacz; and Damon, Key, Char and Bocken, a Hawaii professional (law) corporation; Eric Nagano; Bal Corporation, a Hawaii corporation; Ilekea, Inc., a Hawaii corporation; Marshall Island Investment Company, a Marshall Islands corporation; Lahaina Shores Village Company, a Hawaii corporation; Academy Limited Partners, a Hawaii limited partnership and; Spafford and Ishizaki, Inc., a Hawaii corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16436. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. * Decided Feb. 8, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of…