United States v. Manuel Garcia Bracamonte

985 F.2d 574 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Garcia BRACAMONTE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-50621. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 5, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR89-489-DWW, David W. Williams, District Judge, Presiding. 2 C.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: BROWNING, POOLE and NOONAN, Circuit Judges 5 MEMORANDUM * 6 Appellant Manuel Garcia Bracamonte appeals his conviction and sentence for bank robbery. He complains that the FBI used unconstitutionally suggestive pre-trial identification procedures, that the district court abused its discretion when it permitted lay opinion identification testimony, and that he was entitled to a two point reduction for acceptance of responsibility. We affirm. FACTS 7 In May of 1989 a man robbed a branch of the Bank of America in Fountain Valley, California. The teller, Rose Mary…