David D. Tobkin v. Gary Waltrip

985 F.2d 574 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David D. TOBKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary WALTRIP, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16401. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 16, 1992. Decided Jan. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CV-90-20106-DLJ; D. Lowell Jensen, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal., 139 B.R. 492 AFFIRMED. Before HUG, PREGERSON and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 This is an appeal from the district court's affirmance of a bankruptcy court's decision allowing the discharge of debt arising out of an accountancy partnership dissolution. Appellant David D. Tobkin contends that the district court and bankruptcy court committed reversible error in concluding that the debt was not nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (a). We have jurisdiction…