United States v. James H. Davis

985 F.2d 575 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James H. DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50041. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1993. * Decided Feb. 8, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-91-0512-Kn-1, David V. Kenyon, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before BEEZER, BRUNETTI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant James H. Davis appeals his jury conviction for three counts of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 . We affirm. 3 * Appellant was general manager of Tillie's Memorial Chapel, a funeral parlor. To secure the prepayment of funeral expenses for its clients, Tillie's arranged for "pre-need" accounts to be established on its behalf at Life Savings Bank, in San Bernardino, California. Under this arrangement, Tillie's clients deposited funds into the…