United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. William Benton Cunningham, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

985 F.2d 575 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. William Benton CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. No. 91-30440, 92-30004. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. Decided Jan. 27, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, No. CR-91-00013-EJL Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, presiding. D.Idaho AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, FARRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 A jury convicted Cunningham of several counts of bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (1988); misapplication of funds, 18 U.S.C. § 656 ; making false entries, 18 U.S.C. § 1005 and making false statements, 18 U.S.C. § 1014 . He was sentenced on each count to 12 months custody and 3 years supervised release. His sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Cunningham appeals his convictions;…