United States v. Josefina Hernandez-Ocampo

985 F.2d 575 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Josefina HERNANDEZ-OCAMPO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10171. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1992. Decided Feb. 2, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CR-90-00365-RCB, Robert C. Broomfield, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before SNEED, ALARCON and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Josephina Hernandez Ocampo appeals her conviction, after a jury trial, of conspiracy to obtain false immigration documents in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (a)(c)(6) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 & 1015(d). Ocampo contends that she received ineffective assistance of counsel because her attorney conceded her guilt in his closing argument. We review de novo, United States v. Swanson, 943 F.2d 1070, 1072 (9th Cir.1991), and we affirm. 3 * FACTS 4 The evidence relating to…