United States v. Fausto Enrique Diaz, United States of America v. Adalberto Jose Restrepo-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Lazaro Rico Pinzon
Opinion
Opinion
985 F.2d 575 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fausto Enrique DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adalberto Jose RESTREPO-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lazaro Rico PINZON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-10095, 91-10096 and 91-10100. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 11, 1992. Decided Feb. 2, 1993. As Amended Sept.2, 1993. Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Nos. CR-89-368-01-PHX, CR-89-368-5-PHX-R and CR-89-00368-RCB. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before FLETCHER, POOLE and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 This case arises from an undercover investigation of a Colombian cocaine smuggling operation which led to the indictment and conviction of Defendants Fausto Enrique Diaz, Lazaro Rico-Pinzon and Adalberto Jose Restrepo-Gonzalez (referred to…