United States v. Donald Gene Henthorn

985 F.2d 575 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Gene HENTHORN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50842. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1992. * Decided Dec. 28, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CR-86-1077-04-T; Howard B. Turrentine, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. [APPEAL AFTER REMAND, 931 F.2d 29 .] AFFIRMED. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, SCHROEDER and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This matter is before us following our remand instructing the district court to review the personnel files of Customs Agent Ronald Ingleby and DEA Special Agent Michael Harper to determine, by in camera inspection, whether information in the files should have been disclosed as possible impeachment material in Henthorn's trial. Our decision is reported at 931 F.2d 29 (9th Cir.1991). 3 The district court conducted the review…