United States v. Ronald K. Clark

985 F.2d 575 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald K. CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10534. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1992. Decided Feb. 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; No. CR-91-00112-PMP, Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. D.Nev. REVERSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART, AND REMANDED. Before GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ronald Kerry Clark was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1) (felon in possession of a firearm). Clark appeals his conviction on the grounds that he was deprived of constitutionally adequate assistance of counsel and that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct by knowingly using false testimony. He also appeals his sentence of 360 months imprisonment, arguing that the district court erred in applying the relevant enhancement provisions. We…