United States v. Arturo Herrera-Meras

985 F.2d 575 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arturo HERRERA-MERAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30300. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1992. * Decided Jan. 21, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CR 90-297-JET; Jack E. Tanner, District Judge, Presiding. W.D.Wash. AFFIRMED. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, HUG and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Arturo Herrera-Meras appeals his conviction following a jury trial based on (1) the district court's admission of evidence relating to the alleged weight of cocaine, (2) the district court's admission of compelled testimony, (3) the district court's rulings regarding the defense's version of a transcript of recorded conversations and (4) his federal prosecution after refusing to plead to charges in state court. We affirm. 3 * After a jury trial in the United…