United States v. Donald E. Cunningham

985 F.2d 575 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald E. CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-50044. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. * Decided Feb. 4, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-90-470-RG; Richard A. Gadbois, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, POOLE and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Donald E. Cunningham appeals his conviction on the charge of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a)(d). Cunningham contends that the district court failed to comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(e) in ruling on his motion to suppress and erred in denying the same. We affirm. 3 * On April 23, 1990, at approximately 1:10 p.m., a robbery occurred at the Bank of America located at 20118 Roscoe Boulevard in Winnetka, California. The…