United States v. Edward Javier Silva

Good Law
985 F.2d 576·1993 WL 26982·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8940
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 199392-50426California311 words

Opinion

Opinion

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Javier SILVA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50426. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 27, 1993 * Decided Feb. 5, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward Javier Silva appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines following his guilty plea to three counts of unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Silva contends that the district court erred by refusing to depart downward from the applicable sentencing range based on lack of youthful guidance. We dismiss the appeal. 3 A district court's discretionary refusal to depart downward from the Guidelines is not reviewable on appeal. United States v. Robinson, 958 F.2d 268, 272 (9th Cir.1992). 4 At Silva's sentencing hearing, the district court stated: 5 I do not find an adequate factual basis in this case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.