United States v. Zoltan Sztojko

Good Law
985 F.2d 576·1993 WL 18210·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8923
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 199392-10217California1,289 words

Opinion

Opinion

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Zoltan SZTOJKO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10217. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 13, 1993. Decided Jan. 28, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (Las Vegas); No. CR-91-00126-LDG, Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding. D.Nev. AFFIRMED. Before CHOY, SCHROEDER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Sztojko appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance and distribution of a controlled substance. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The government's evidence at trial showed that Sztojko and his co-conspirator Lorand Bodolay were involved in a sale of cocaine to an FBI undercover agent, Robert Bennett. The testimony of Bennett and a government informant named Hajek detailed Sztojko's extensive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.