United States v. Ronald Lister

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald LISTER, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-50116, 92-50122. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1993. Decided Jan. 28, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Nos. CR-89-1084-05, CR-91-0206-01, Rudi M. Brewster, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED IN NO. 92-50116, AND REVERSED IN NO. 92-50122. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, POOLE and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 * The district court correctly concluded the plea agreement in No. 92-50116 was void. The agreement was not ambiguous. It clearly bound Lister "not [to] commit any further crimes." It also provided "violation of any provision of this agreement [renders] it null and void." Lister's release on bond was conditioned upon his remaining within the Southern and Central Districts of California. Lister's…