United States v. Dale William Martineau

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dale William MARTINEAU, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50113. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 4, 1993. Decided Feb. 9, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-91-0625-RSWL-2; Ronald S.W. New, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before BEEZER, BRUNETT and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Dale William Martineau was convicted of aiding and abetting the robbery of the Downey Savings and Loan. The savings and loan was robbed by Douglas Dean Hannam. Martineau drove the getaway car, but his defense was that he did not know Hannam had robbed the savings and loan. Hannam testified that Martineau didn't have anything to do with the robbery. On cross-examination he testified he and Martineau were casual acquaintances and Martineau never touched a paper…