United States v. Marsha Lois Kaiserman

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marsha Lois KAISERMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 7, 1993. * Decided Jan. 28, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-91-0433-RG-01, Richard A. Gadbois, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED IN COUNTS ONE, TWO AND FOUR, AND REVERSED IN COUNT THREE. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, POOLE and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The evidence was sufficient to support Kaiserman's convictions on counts one, two and four for mailing a threatening communication in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876 but insufficient to support her conviction on count three. Counts One and Four 3 Rational jurors could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant's December 26, 1990 letter to Judge Mireles (Count One) was not merely a statement of an…