United States v. Jose Luis Sosa-Rivera

Good Law
985 F.2d 576·1993 WL 22367·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8929
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 2, 199392-50272California844 words

Opinion

Opinion

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jose Luis SOSA-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-50272. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 27, 1993. * Decided Feb. 2, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The United States appeals the sentence imposed on Jose Luis Sosa-Rivera following his guilty plea to possessing with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). The government contends the district court erred by departing from the 21-27 month range prescribed by the Sentencing Guidelines to sentence appellee to straight probation without proper grounds and without articulating facts to support the departure. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We have established a three-part test for evaluating a district court's decision to depart from the presumptively applicable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.