United States v. Joseph Meyer Tajan

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Meyer TAJAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30390. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1992. Decided Jan. 25, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho; No. CR 91-006-N-HLR, Harold L. Ryan, District Judge, Presiding. D. Idaho AFFIRMED. Before: HUG, POOLE and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Joseph Meyer Tajan appeals his conviction for aiding and abetting the manufacture of marijuana, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1); 841(b)(1)(vii); 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Tajan alleges a due process violation, breach of a leniency agreement, and the improper admission of a coerced confession and tainted evidence. Tajan also appeals his sentence, arguing that the trial judge both misinterpreted and misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines. I. 3 The asserted violation of Tajan's due process rights is…