United States v. Dung Tien Ngo

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dung Tien NGO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50794. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 5, 1993. Decided Jan. 28, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-91-551-R, Manuel Real, Chief District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED AND REMANDED. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, POOLE and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Dung Tien Ngo appeals his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 3922 (g)(1). He contends that the district court erred in not granting his motion to suppress, in refusing to admit evidence concerning the owner of the vehicle in which the gun was found, and in allowing the prosecutor to question the defense witness about gang membership. He also claims that there was no support for the court's…