United States v. Franco Luk Shkreli

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Franco Luk SHKRELI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-50119. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 16, 1992. * Decided Jan. 28, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-88-0717-HLH-1, Harry L. Hupp, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before KILKENNY, GOODWIN and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Franco Luk Shkreli appeals his conviction, following a conditional guilty plea, for one count of possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (d). The only issues on appeal challenge the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm. 3 The following facts were adduced from the declaration of Los Angeles Police Officer Thomas Hickey filed in opposition to the motion to suppress and his testimony at the suppression hearing: 4 On May 22, 1988,…