United States v. Richard Enrique Rojas and George Albert Rojas

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Enrique ROJAS and George Albert Rojas, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 92-10057, 92-10058. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 18, 1992. Decided Jan. 21, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, No. CR-90-00265-PMP; Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. D.Nev. AFFIRMED. Before HUG, PREGERSON and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Richard Enrique Rojas appeals both his convictions for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and distribution of a controlled substance in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) and his sentence. George Albert Rojas challenges only his conviction for distribution of a controlled substance. 3 The district court's jurisdiction was based upon 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We exercise jurisdiction over these timely appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…