United States v. Jon Barton Shields

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jon Barton SHIELDS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50766. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1992. * Decided Jan. 25, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; No. CR-89-0059-01-K, Judith N. Keep, Chief Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. [APPEAL AFTER REMAND FROM, 939 F.2d 780 .] AFFIRMED. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jon Barton Shields appeals pro se his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following our remand in United States v. Shields, 939 F.2d 780 (9th Cir.1992). Shields was convicted by guilty plea of introducing steroids in interstate commerce and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331 (a), 333(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Shields contends the district court erred by relying on the dollar amount of…