United States v. Alfredo Renteria

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo RENTERIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50627. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 7, 1993. Decided Feb. 5, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR 90-634(A), Robert M. Takasugi, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, POOLE and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Alfredo Renteria appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine, possession with the intent to distribute cocaine, and money laundering. Renteria claims that he entered into a cooperation agreement with law enforcement officers in which they promised not to prosecute him for the conduct underlying these offenses. He also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conspiracy and distribution convictions,…