United States v. Russell Neil Scott

985 F.2d 576 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Russell Neil SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10112. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 15, 1992. Decided Jan. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CR 91-202-PHX-SMM; Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendant/Appellant Russell Neil Scott ("Scott"), an American Indian, appeals his jury conviction on seven counts of aggravated sexual abuse of an American Indian child under the age of twelve within the confines of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, in Parker, Arizona. Scott also appeals various aspects of his sentence of life imprisonment under the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm. DISCUSSION A. Voluntary Intoxication Instruction 3 Scott argues that the district court…