United States v. Carl Lee Wright

985 F.2d 577 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Lee WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50294. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 1, 1993. * Decided Feb. 4, 1993. 1 Before BEEZER, BRUNETTI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Carl Lee Wright appeals his sentence imposed by the district court under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm. I. 4 Appellant was indicted on five counts of armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a)(d) (1992). He pled guilty to three of those counts, and was sentenced to 210 months incarceration, followed by a three year period of supervised release. Appellant objects to this sentence on two grounds. II 5 First, appellant argues the district court improperly sentenced him under the "career offender" category of the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court determined that appellant was a career offender…