United States v. Andrew Allen Zane

985 F.2d 577 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Allen ZANE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50164. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 5, 1993. Decided Jan. 28, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-89-0959-WMB-1, William Matthew Byrne, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, POOLE and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * I. 2 The evidence was sufficient to establish Zane's possession of the drugs. The cocaine was found on the side of the closet containing male clothing. See United States v. Terry, 911 F.2d 272, 278 (9th Cir.1990) (evidence sufficient to establish defendant's control over gun found on a shelf in a closet he shared with his wife where men's boots were on the shelf and men's clothes were stored in that side of the closet). Moreover, an undercover informant…