United States v. Henry Van Buren

985 F.2d 577 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry VAN BUREN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10129. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 27, 1993. * Decided Feb. 3, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Henry Van Buren appeals from his sentence, imposed following a guilty plea, for concealment of property belonging to the estate of a debtor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152 . Van Buren contends that (1) the district court erred by calculating his offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines based on the entire $400,000 he admitted concealing, and (2) the government breached his plea agreement by failing to consider recommending a departure below the applicable Guidelines range. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 Van Buren and his codefendants were charged in an eighteen-count indictment…