Geronimo Zarazua v. Charles D. Marshall, Warden James Rowland, Director

985 F.2d 577 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Geronimo ZARAZUA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden; James Rowland, Director, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-15720. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 27, 1993. * Decided Feb. 2, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CV-90-02159-SBA, Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Geronimo A. Zarazua, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition, challenging disciplinary proceedings conducted by the California Department of Corrections in which Zarazua was found guilty of taking part in an assault upon another inmate. As a result, Zarazua lost good time credits which he had earned. Zarazua contends that his due process rights were…