Robert Wright v. United Airlines, Inc.

985 F.2d 577 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15377. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted: Jan. 27, 1993. * Decided Feb. 3, 1993. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Wright appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in favor of United Airlines (United) in Wright's employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Wright contends that the district court erroneously found that Wright's voluntary withdrawal of his first charge of employment discrimination barred his suit. Wright had received a right-to-sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in connection with a second complaint alleging that his supervisor retaliated against him for filing the first complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…